This cumulative meta-analysis suggested that compared with DCR without intubation, DCR with intubation had a much better rate of success after surgery, especially in the EX-DCR subgroup. The difference was statistically significant [RR, 1.06; 95%CI (1.02–1.11), p = 0.006]. In most cases where the obstruction of the tear duct is in the nose, there is a 90% success rate. This means 1 in 10 people may not improve after surgery. Rarely if the obstruction is in the tiny tear canals on the eyelid, the success rate is less and can vary between 50-90% depending on the extent of blockage. The success rate was 77.4% (24/31 DCRs) in the END-DCR group, and 84.1% (37/44 DCRs) in the EXT-DCR group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding overall success (p = 0.465). DCR with silicone tube intubation has been accepted as a highly successful procedure in patients with history of epiphora and discharge following chronic dacryocystitis. A review of literature reveals a success rate of 90 - 95% (3-5). Failure of DCR may be attributed mainly to anastomosis failure due to defective identification and
24 May 2012 The average success rate of endonasal DCR with unciformectomy was 97.8 % and that of endonasal DCR alone was 90.2 %, with statistically
The success rate of endonasal DCR in acute dacryocystitis is 83–94.4% in different case series.[] Rabina et al[] reported a 94.4% success rate of conventional 16 May 2017 The success rates of external DCR (EX-DCR) with and without intubation were also significantly different based on subgroup analysis (p = 0.002). 21 Oct 2019 Prognosis after DCR is excellent, with success rates up to 90-95% for the external approach. Although there has been a wider range of success The success rate of external DCR has been reported at between 80% and 99% depending on the surgeon's experience.3-10Combining the results of a total of
Prognosis after DCR is excellent, with success rates up to 90-95% for the external approach. Although there has been a wider range of success rates reported with the endonasal DCR technique, some studies have demonstrated success rates comparable to those obtained with external DCR.
What’s the Success Rate? Electrical cardioversion is more than 90% effective, though many have AFib again shortly after having it. Taking an antiarrhythmic drug before the procedure can prevent Tsirbas and Wormald are to be congratulated on their landmark paper in lacrimal surgery describing endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with mucosal flaps, 1 which is also known as powered endonasal DCR. 2,3 Their results are seemingly impressive, with anatomical success rate of 95% and functional success rate of 89%, The success rates of endo-DCR are comparable with those of external DCR, and are reported in the literature as being around 90% . There are sparse articles on the reasons for failure of endo-DCRs. However, while this very quick procedure may be less technically challenging than the transnasal approach, the reported success rate for primary transcanalicular DCR, at 80%–85%, is still lower than that of external DCR in most case series. Qu: What is the success rate of DCR surgery? The success rate depends very much on the nature of the underlying causes of watering. In general, the likelihood of a cure from troublesome stickiness and discharge from the eye is in the region of 95% (+). However, the success rate for cure of all watering (note,
The average success rate of endonasal DCR with unciformectomy was 97.8 % and that of endonasal DCR alone was 90.2 %, with statistically significant difference (Student's t-test, p-value < 0.05). There were 14 eyes with post-operative nasolacrimal obstruction, caused by granuloma in five eyes, intranasal synechia in two eyes, membranous obstruction in six eyes, and canalicular stenosis in one eye.
The success rate of external DCR has been reported at between 80% and 99% depending on the surgeon's experience.3-10Combining the results of a total of The success rate of canaliculo-DCR is quoted as 50–60%, while the success rate of conjunctival DCR plus Jones tube is reported to be as good. However, it is FULL TEXT Abstract: The purpose of this study is to compare the success rates of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) and external DCR 24 May 2012 The average success rate of endonasal DCR with unciformectomy was 97.8 % and that of endonasal DCR alone was 90.2 %, with statistically increase the surgical success rate (7), it has been a controversial issue. In the literature, while the success rates of DCR with silicone tube intubation are seen,
22 Dec 2015 Procedure success rate among kerrison punch group was 87.88 % vs. 90.9 % in powered drill group (p = 0.827), while complications for both
Data of all patients who underwent external DCR with silicone intubation in a 5- year The overall success rate in all patients was 89%, which was higher in the 19 Jan 2011 Several case series have estimated the success rate of external DCR to the success rates of endonasal DCR with that of external DCR in the 24 Jul 2019 Since Toti's original description of DCR in 1904, external approach has been used for relief of the lacrimal obstruction [1]. The success rate of 5 Aug 2010 resistance to syringing pre-operatively and successful DCR (p=0.012). success rates in excess of 90%.1-6 However there is a significant